In terms of interior space, the C4 Cactus doesnât do much worse than the VW Golf, despite being a lot cheaper. It is, however, much more spacious than the quirky Nissan Juke. The front seats are like armchairs, and are easy to get comfy in, although itâs a shame that the steering wheel isnât reach-adjustable.
Skip to ContentSkip to FooterWe put crucial new Ford EcoSport crossover through its paces against bold new Citroen and big-selling Nissan13 Aug 2014Traditionally, small family cars are all cut from a similar cloth and follow the small hatchback template. But with the spectacular rise in the popularity of SUVs has come a much broader range of styles, shapes and characters to choose from. Which is why the three contenders weâve gathered here all fit loosely into the supermini SUV category, but go about their business in very different is our first chance to drive the Ford EcoSport on UK roads, and since itâs based on Britainâs best-selling car and our Supermini of the Year â the Ford Fiesta â itâs a mouth-watering proposition. If it can carry over even some of the Fiestaâs playful handling, while boosting practicality and visibility, Ford is on to another winner. However, the EcoSportâs route to UK roads has been a unusual was originally designed in Brazil with emerging markets in mind. We drove a South American versionaround Sao Paulo way back in 2012 and have been waiting patiently ever since. UK cars are builtin India and tweaked for European tastes with higher specification and new powertrains, including a TDCi diesel and the award-winning EcoBoost three-cylinder petrol driven here. But has Ford done enough to disguise the carâs cut-price roots?The Citroen C4 Cactus takes a more relaxed approach, majoring on comfort, ease of use and distinctive design. Itâs a technique thatâs served Citroen well in the past and, with first deliveries next month, looks set to strike a chord with customers tired of makers harping on about sporty handling, when all they want is something to tackle everyday trips with the minimum of again, sporty handling and brash styling have served the hugely successful Nissan Juke well since it invented the class in 2010. The Juke has recently been reinvigorated with a fresh look and a new DIG-T turbo engine, but has it still got the game to see off this pair of pretenders?StylingWhile its two main rivals have a look all of their own, the EcoSport is more of a Fiesta on stilts, so the proportions are less successful. View it from the front, and Fordâs globally recognised wide-mouthed grille and slim headlights look smart, but from the rear the horrendous spare wheel stuck to the tailgate undoes all the good work with more than a whiffof late eighties Suzuki reviews The interior design will be instantly familiar to Fiesta owners, too, with the same confusing array of buttons strewn across the centre console and a dated LCD screen set deep into the dash. The overall look is angular and modern, but start scratching, poking and squeezing the trim materials and it feels much cheaper than a the Juke next to the EcoSport, and the Nissan looks as if itâs been beamed down from another planet. The mid-life changes are limited to tweaked headlights, a new lower front grille and redesigned rear bumper, but the Juke was so radical four years ago, it still looks fresh now. Itâs a similar story inside where the shiny-coloured inserts and motorbike-inspired centre console are hardly subtle, but reflect the sporty way the Juke the line between them is the C4 Cactus, which combines quirky flourishes like the Airbump panels and two-piece headlights with minimalist surfaces and perfect proportions. The result could have been a mess, but by being bold Citroen designed something thatâs cool and contemporary without being overly if the outside appeals, then the uncluttered interior should, too, from its flat, wide and squidgy front seats to its stripped-back dash, consisting of a central screen and a digital instrument cluster. You sit lower than in the other cars â the C4 Cactus is based on the C3 platform, but has similar dimensions to a C4, with slightly more ground clearance â and Citroen has made the most of limited resources, placing soft-touch materials on the most prominent surfaces and cheaper stuff lower the EcoSport should excel in one area, itâs from behind the wheel, and there are clear echoes of the Fiesta. The steering is immediate and direct, while the gearshift has a notchy, mechanical in corners the centre of gravity feels significantly higher as the car tips from side to side. A glance at the spec sheet reveals why â at 1,350kg, this car weighs 259kg more than the Fiesta EcoBoost. So while the 123bhp three- cylinder fizzes away under the bonnet of the Fiesta, here it feels laboured and flat. It still maintains its smoothness and refinement at high revs, but getting up to speed is hard work. Once youâre there the ride quality is good, thanks to the extra suspension travel, but in the transition from supermini to SUV the Fiestaâs spark has been big surprise is how much faster the C4 Cactus feels than its rivals here. With only 1,020kg to haul around (about 200kg less than an equivalent C4 hatch), it shoots forward once the turbo spools things easy, slide the gearstick slowly through its ratios and thereâs enough torque for gliding around in higher gears, enjoying the spongy suspension and the peace and quiet in the cabin. If you are in a hurry, though, the Cactus is capable â youâll just need to be patient, while it leans on its outside springs in corners, before shooting off down the next straight. By contrast, the Juke feels firmer, with meatier steering. Although the ride is never uncomfortable, you feel more bumps than in the other cars â the pay-off is a bit of fun when the road opens a kerbweight of 1,236kg, the Juke doesnât have quite the pace of the Cactus off the line, but in-gear acceleration from the new DIG-T punches well above its cubic terms of interior space, the EcoSport is hard to argue against. With the split fold rear seats in place thereâs a 310-litre boot (the smallest here), but drop them and it offers 1,238 litres (the most here). Rear leg and headroom is top of the pile, too, while the raised driving position is more SUV-like than the Citroenâ spend some time in the Ford and problems begin to emerge, such as thick A-pillars that hamper front visibility and the fact the load area isnât flat with the seats down. By far the biggest annoyance, though, is the side-hinged tailgate: while it creates a nice low loading lip, it means youâll need to leave a good five feet of space behind you when you park to open it â not ideal in congested town Juke canât swallow the same amount of luggage (its 354-litre boot grows to 1,189 litres), but its packaging is better thought through. A false floor lets you decide between a perfectly level loading lip and a flat load area in its higher position, or maximum space for your bags when you lower it. Large adults wonât want to spend prolonged periods in the back, though, as the sloping roofline eats into Citroen started with the C3 supermini, the amount of luggage space itâs squeezed out of the Cactus is impressive. With the back seats in place, the 358-litre boot is the biggest here; fold them and it grows to 1,170 itâs not all good news. To cut costs and weight, a split-fold rear bench is optional, while the pop-out rear windows might be too claustrophobic for some. Still, we like the fact Citroen has made a virtue of those rear windows by installing huge door bins in the rear, while leg and headroom is on a par with the Jukeâ costsIf running costs are a priority, all three cars offer a more efficient diesel engine option. But plumping for petrol isnât the compromise it once was, plus you save on the price (the petrol EcoSport is ÂŁ500 cheaper). The EcoBoostâs economy and 125g/km emissions arenât bad on paper (especially as the Juke claims and 126g/km), but youâll have to put up with a frustratingly slow 0-62mph time of the Cactus perfectly demonstrates the benefit of lightweight engineering. Weighing 216kg less than its closest rival here, it claims and 107g/km, but is over a second faster from 0-62mph than the EcoSport is the cheapest car in this test, and only comes in Titanium spec. But while you get 16-inch alloy wheels, LED running lights and a cooled glovebox as standard, our test modelâs Kinetic Blue metallic paint costs extra, as do rear parking mid-spec Juke costs around ÂŁ500 more, yet it gets a screen with sat-nav, plus three driving modes and 17-inch wheels. Our top-spec C4 Cactus Flair is another ÂŁ500 still, but has all the kit you could need, including sat-nav, a rear parking camera and a seven-inch touchscreen. By comparison the Fordâs kit list â and the whole package, for that matter â feels a generation which would we choose?Itâs possible to make a case for any one of these cars, depending on where your priorities lie. The EcoSport has the most space inside, the Juke is infused with a sense of fun the other two canât match and the C4 Cactus is the easiest to live look beyond the EcoSportâs practicality and it falls woefully short. Build quality is fine for emerging markets, but not good enough for European tastes, and the Fiestaâs superb handling has been blunted by the extra itâs sharp handling you want, the Juke is top of the pile, and the lively turbo engine gets the best out of the chassis, although the striking body shape compromises interior space. As for the Cactus, it manages to mix desirability, space, efficiency and performance in a package that charms all who drive it â which is why it takes how about the Mokka?The Vauxhall Mokka fits neatly into this company on the face of it, although we decided to leave it out of our test for a number of actually a little larger than our trio, at 4,278mm long, plus it offers maximum boot space of 1,372 litres â so it sits somewhere between the Nissan Juke and its Qashqai big brother. The Mokka is more pricey, too, with even the entry-level 113bhp Exclusiv petrol costing ÂŁ18, there are some cracking offers out there that help to make the Mokka almost as affordable as the EcoSport, C4 Cactus and StepsMost PopularToyota bZ4X vs Volkswagen vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: 2022 group test reviewCar group testsToyota bZ4X vs Volkswagen vs Hyundai Ioniq 5: 2022 group test reviewDoes Toyotaâs all-new bZ4X electric SUV crack the family-friendly formula? We compare it to Hyundai and VW rivals23 Jul 2022Hyundai plots electric city car for under ÂŁ20kNewsHyundai plots electric city car for under ÂŁ20kHyundai is looking to expand its EV line-up with an affordable compact model to rival electric city cars from the Volkswagen Group22 Jul 2022Best electric cars to buy 2022Best cars & vansBest electric cars to buy 2022There are more electric cars than ever to choose from, so we've picked some of the best you can buy in the UK now6 Jul 2022Skip to HeaderSkip to Content
Face à face technique entre : Citroen C4 Cactus PureTech 82 et Nissan Juke Hybrid. Qui va remporter le comparateur automobile ? Les réponses sont ici ! Bringing car spotting into perspective Real height1 m 2 + 8 cm 1 m Real height1 + cm 1 m Real length Click/tap cars to swap positions Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer. Side ViewCitroën C4 Cactus (E3) SUV 2014 vs. Nissan Juke (F15) SUV 2010 Technical specs | Citroën C4 Cactus (E3) SUV 2014 is cm longer and 8 cm lower compared to Nissan Juke (F15) SUV 2010. It offers 41% more cargo 1. Maximum height | 2. Width with folded mirrors | 3. Max. ground clearance | 4. Most common power unit. Possible deviation of standards. | 5. With rear seats folded down Quick Facts 719400 Comparison combinations Germany Origin of the most car models 1908 Year of our oldest car model . 530 731 284 483 372 515 366 129